内部链接
4 minute read · Updated 28 August 2026
内部 链接 points from one page on a domain to another page on the same domain. That is the entire definition — a link in the navigation is an internal link, and so is one inside a paragraph, in a footer, or in a related-posts box.
Internal links are the only ranking factor a site owner fully controls, and they are the mechanism by which search engines discover, weigh and categorise everything a site publishes.
What counts, and what does not
Any link whose destination sits on the same domain counts: the menu, the footer, 面包屑, a related-posts block, a link mid-sentence, a logo pointing home, an image wrapped in a link, a button. All of them divide up the value the page has to pass on.
What does not count: links to another domain — those are external links — links that only fire through JavaScript with no 链接 to follow, and anything behind a login. A crawler can only follow what stands in the HTML as a real anchor with a real address. A site whose navigation is a JavaScript menu without a fallback has, from a crawler’s point of view, almost no internal links at all.
The three jobs they do
- Discovery. A crawler arrives at the homepage and follows links. If nothing points at a page, there is no route to it — and 点击深度 decides how often the ones that are reachable get revisited.
- Distribution. Whatever standing a domain has flows along its internal links. This is what people mean by link equity.
- Classification. The words in the link and the sentence around it tell a search engine what the target is about. Twenty pages pointing at one page with related wording is a strong, consistent signal.
The first two are mechanical. The third is where the craft is, and it is called 锚文本.
Structural versus editorial
重要的区别不在于 哪里 a link sits but whether a human decided on it. Navigation links are structural: every page gets them, so they say very little about any individual page. A link inside a sentence is editorial — somebody decided that this passage was a good reason to send a reader to that page. Search engines weigh the second kind far more heavily, and so do readers.
This is why a long article with a full menu, a full footer and not one link in the prose is the normal case on the web, and also the most common thing worth fixing.
The failure almost every site shares
Almost everyone links forward and never backward. A new post links to two older ones, and that is the end of it.
The direction is wrong. An older page that still receives traffic has something a new page does not: it has been indexed for years, it holds whatever backlinks it collected, and it gets crawled regularly. A link from there is worth more than a link from the post published yesterday.
So the valuable move is the one nobody makes — going into the archive and linking 转发, from the old pages to the new one. It does not happen because it means opening dozens of posts and searching each of them, which is exactly the kind of work that gets postponed indefinitely.
How many, and where on the page
There is no fixed limit. The old advice of “no more than 100 links per page” came from a crawler size constraint that stopped applying many years ago.
What remains true is arithmetic: whatever a page passes on is divided among its outgoing links, so twenty carry more each than two hundred. The question is therefore not “what is the maximum” but “is each of these doing something”. A workable heuristic for editorial content is 每千字两到五个上下文链接, on top of whatever the template already places.
Placement follows the reader rather than the algorithm. Higher in the body beats lower, and prose beats a list at the end — a link in the third paragraph gets clicked, a link in a “you may also like” strip below the fold mostly does not.
How to see what you have
两项检查,都不会花很长时间。.
搜索控制台 → 链接 → 内部链接。. Free, already collecting, and it ranks every URL by how many internal links point at it. Read it from the bottom: pages with one or two inbound links are the ones the site is quietly telling Google not to bother with.
爬行。. Any crawler reporting inlinks and outlinks per URL shows the same in more detail — plus the pages Search Console cannot show, those with 零 inbound links, which never appear in a report built from links that exist.
Compare both lists against a third: the pages you actually want to rank. Where the three disagree is the work list, already in priority order.